Program on the Environment

Urban greenspaces are disappearing due to forces like increased privatization, under-utilization, and a lack of financial support. As they dissolve, human-nature connections and positive health outcomes associated with the environment rapidly decline. The aim of this study was to understand who does and does not have access to urban greenspaces and identify how access can be improved in the future. As part of my internship with Friends of Cheasty, I analyzed past monitoring reports of Cheasty Greenspace in Beacon Hill. The reports contributed to the development of a survey, asking nearby residents about their demographics, activity preferences and barriers that prevent them from using the greenspace. Finally, I conducted an extensive literature review that supported the survey data and informed future management suggestions. The survey data showed that users of Cheasty Greenspace did not reflect the broader demographic profile of the area, excluding underprivileged groups. Additionally, mountain biking was identified as a “least important” activity, and common barriers were safety, homelessness, and trail infrastructure. Finally, the literature review revealed the possibility of a “green gentrification” development, where Cheasty Greenspace has increased nearby property values, driving out disadvantaged communities and decreasing their access to urban greenspaces. This research reveals the importance of managing urban greenspaces with the intention of embracing underprivileged communities, removing common barriers, and supporting community activity preferences. Resisting “green gentrification” requires a community-oriented approach that includes inclusive management within greenspaces and improved social services outside of them.